Are these nursery rhymes safe to teach and learn?-- I mean, yeah, such petty things do pester me!
I’m a Punjabi and naturally, I loved
listening to Honey Singh’s songs. Gradually the songs went from ‘dirty’ to
‘very dirty’ and I started becoming uncomfortable listening to them in social
situations, leave alone dancing on them. But what is it that makes these songs dirty?
It is the sexism and the objectification of women in these songs.
But where did Honey Singh, Badshah, etc. and
others learn that women are objects which appeal to men and that they are subservient
to men? And where did they learn from that it is normal to objectify women and
that they can get away with the evil act. Well, one may be shocked to know that
we have been learning that sexism is normal from the time we were NURSERY KIDS!
But what did we learn in nursery? A bunch of rhymes only. But these not-so-cute
rhymes are inherently sexist and racist. Take for example,
Peter, Peter pumpkin eater,
Had a wife but couldn't keep her;(1)
He put her in a pumpkin shell (2)
And there he kept her very well.
Peter, Peter pumpkin eater,
Had another and didn't love her… (3)
Had a wife but couldn't keep her;(1)
He put her in a pumpkin shell (2)
And there he kept her very well.
Peter, Peter pumpkin eater,
Had another and didn't love her… (3)
In the rhyme, woman (1) is clearly depicted as an object who could be
‘kept’ (2) somewhere if she is ‘unmanageable’ (1) by the husband and can be
replaced by another woman whom he hadn’t learnt to love yet (3).
Another example is,
There was an old woman who lived in a shoe (1)
She had so many children she did not know what to do
She gave them some broth without any bread (2)
She whipped them all soundly and put them to bed.[1]
In the text above, the single woman is shown as a poor lady when it says
she lives in a shoe (1). She is unable to provide for the family (2) since the
male member is absent.
A yet another example is the popular rhyme and my cousin’s favourite
(she is 4 years old and knows when she is looking beautiful and when she is
not) ‘Chubby cheeks’ which reads as
Chubby Cheeks, (1)
dimple chin, Rosy lips,
teeth within, Curly hair, very fair, (1)
dimple chin, Rosy lips,
teeth within, Curly hair, very fair, (1)
Eyes so blue, lovely too…
The rhyme reinforces the fact that ‘chubbiness’ and ‘very fair’ makes
you desirable. And the popularity of this rhyme is across cultures! Does this
mean that those class of people who are poor, can’t afford to have chubby
babies, or African/black babies aren’t desirable?
Rhymes for the nursery were supposed to relax and teach language to the
children but have rather been used to promote racism and to dictate that role
of females in society is inferior to men.
Comments
Post a Comment